“Sovereignty” is a word the definition of which is often confused with “self-sovereignty”, “liberty”, and “autonomy”. While sovereignty, self-sovereignty, liberty, and autonomy are all related to freedom, each speaks to freedom in a different form, context, or environment.
Self-sovereignty, liberty, and autonomy refer to states of self – an individual can be self-sovereign; an individual can have liberty and autonomy. Sovereignty refers to the sovereign – that entity with the authority to make and enforce laws for the protection of the rights and properties of its citizens and to make war and protect its territory by calling on the power of its militia. Often defined as the “supreme authority”, the sovereign in a monarchy, for example, would be the king or queen, while in a government by oligarchy the sovereign would be a small group of people.
A sovereign is the authority, or law maker, to which a member of a society yields in order to gain his liberty. Liberty is one’s freedom of physical action within the limits of the law prescribed by the sovereign. Therefore, one who is a law unto himself and beholden to no external authority is self-sovereign. An individual does not have sovereignty – an individual having sovereignty would by definition be self-sovereign, which is a state of existence unachievable in today’s post-Globalization world.
Autonomy, on the other hand, refers to one’s ability to make independent decisions and act on them based on personal values and beliefs, without external influence. I like to think of autonomy as “intellectual freedom and self-government of thought”. Autonomy leads to cognition through reason, logic, and deduction; or, critical thinking, in short, and is a core driver of one’s individuality and identity.
I hope this clarifies the differences and similarities between sovereignty, self-sovereignty, liberty, and autonomy.
Thanks for reading!