The Arabian Peninsula, often perceived as a peripheral desert region in ancient history, was in fact home to some of the most sophisticated and influential civilizations of the pre-Islamic world. Between the 8th century BCE and the 6th century CE, six major kingdoms rose to prominence across the peninsula: the Sabaean Kingdom (1200-275 CE), the Kingdom of Ma’in (8th-1st century BCE), the Kingdom of Qataban (4th century BCE-200 CE), the Kingdom of Hadramaut (8th century BCE-300 CE), the Kingdom of Himyar (110 BCE-525 CE), and the Nabataean Kingdom (312 BCE-106 CE). These empires did not exist in isolation; rather, they formed a complex web of alliances, rivalries, and conflicts that shaped the political, economic, and cultural landscape of ancient Arabia.
The story of these kingdoms is fundamentally one of competition over the lucrative incense trade that connected the aromatic wealth of southern Arabia to the markets of the Mediterranean world. Frankincense and myrrh, worth more than gold in ancient times, drove these civilizations to develop innovative military technologies, sophisticated irrigation systems, and complex diplomatic strategies. Through their interactions—whether through trade agreements, military alliances, or territorial conquests—these empires collectively created a legacy that would influence the development of the Arabian Peninsula long after their fall. This article examines how these six empires rose to power, expanded their influence, and ultimately declined, with particular focus on their military and political interactions that transformed one empire into another.
The Rise Of Sabaean Hegemony
The Kingdom of Saba emerged as the dominant power in South Arabia during the 8th century BCE, centered around its capital Marib in modern-day Yemen [1, 2, 3]. Under the reign of Karib’il Watar in the 7th century BCE, Saba launched a series of devastating military campaigns that established its supremacy over the region [4, 5]. Archaeological inscriptions from Sirwah document eight major campaigns that demonstrate the systematic nature of Sabaean warfare—the complete destruction of the rival kingdom of Awsan resulted in 16,000 killed and 40,000 captured, while campaigns against the western highlands yielded 8,000 prisoners [6, 7, 8].
The Sabaeans pioneered siege warfare techniques in ancient Arabia, developing strategies for the systematic destruction of enemy cities and temples [9]. Their military organization consisted of a professional national army called the khamīs under royal command, supplemented by tribal contingents led by aristocratic clan leaders [10]. This dual structure allowed Saba to project power across vast territories while maintaining control through local allies. The kingdom’s most significant technological achievement was the Marib Dam, an engineering marvel that created artificial oases and supported a population that could sustain large military forces [11, 12].
Saba’s early dominance created a hierarchical system where neighboring kingdoms like Ma’in, Qataban, and Hadramaut initially operated as vassals or allies [13, 14]. However, this hegemony contained the seeds of its own destruction. The wealth generated by controlling the incense trade routes attracted competition, while the kingdom’s aggressive military policies created lasting resentments that would fuel future coalitions against Sabaean power [15].
Challenger: The Merchant Kingdom Of Ma’in
While Saba focused on military conquest, the Kingdom of Ma’in pursued a radically different strategy that would revolutionize Arabian trade [16]. Emerging as an independent power in the 6th century BCE after benefiting from Saba’s destruction of their rival Nashshan, the Minaeans developed what archaeologists describe as the ancient world’s first international trading corporation [17]. By the 4th century BCE, Ma’in had established permanent trading colonies across the Mediterranean, with inscriptions found from Egypt to the Greek island of Delos documenting their commercial presence [18, 19].
The Minaeans’ approach to warfare was notably defensive rather than offensive. Archaeological evidence from their capital Baraqish reveals massive fortification walls reaching 14 meters high with 57 towers, yet Minaean royal inscriptions make no mention of wars undertaken by the king—a stark contrast to the boastful military records of their neighbors [20, 21]. Instead, Ma’in secured its position through “covenants of safe-conduct”with surrounding powers, using economic leverage rather than military force to maintain security [22].
This commercial focus brought Ma’in into direct conflict with Saba over control of the caravan routes. Sabaean attacks on Minaean caravans, particularly along the strategic Ma’in-Najran corridor, represent some of the earliest documented examples of economic warfare in Arabian history [23]. The conflict intensified as Ma’in’s trade network expanded, with the kingdom forming alliances with Qataban and Hadramaut based on mutual commercial interests [24]. However, Ma’in’s neglect of military development ultimately proved fatal—by the late 2nd century BCE, the kingdom had fallen under Qatabanian control, and the Roman expedition of 25 BCE found multiple Minaean towns destroyed or surrendered to Sabaean forces [25, 26].
Qataban’s Coalition & Anti-Sabaean Alliance
The Kingdom of Qataban emerged as a major power in the 4th century BCE, initially as an ally of Saba before becoming its primary rival [27, 28]. Archaeological evidence from the capital Timna, which Pliny the Elder claimed contained 65 temples, reveals a sophisticated urban civilization that pioneered several military and political innovations [29, 30]. Most notably, Qataban developed a unique dual kingship system, with two rulers sharing power—a structure that may have provided greater political stability during succession crises [31].
Qataban’s military strategy centered on coalition building, culminating in the 1st century BCE with the formation of the most significant military alliance in ancient South Arabian history [32]. This anti-Sabaean coalition united Qataban with Hadramaut, Radman, Madhay, and various Arab nomadic tribes in a coordinated campaign against Sabaean hegemony [33]. The alliance represented a sophisticated understanding of balance-of-power politics, as these kingdoms recognized that only through unity could they challenge Saba’s dominance.
The kingdom controlled crucial segments of the incense route and developed advanced flash-flood irrigation methods that were more efficient than the constant-flow systems used elsewhere [34]. This economic prosperity funded a professional warrior class that Pliny the Elder still described as “proficient warriors” during the Roman expedition of 26 BCE [35]. However, Qataban’s strategic position between expanding powers ultimately led to its downfall. The secession of Himyar in 110 BCE marked the beginning of decline, and by 200 CE, the kingdom had been conquered and divided between Hadramaut and the rising Himyarite state [36, 37].
Hadramaut’s Monopoly & Defense Mastery
The Kingdom of Hadramaut possessed the ultimate strategic asset in ancient Arabian economics: exclusive control over the frankincense-producing regions of Dhofar [38, 39]. From their capital at Shabwa, where all frankincense was required to be collected and taxed before entering the caravan trade, Hadramaut’s rulers built a kingdom that endured longer than any of their neighbors, maintaining independence from the 8th century BCE until approximately 300 CE [40, 41].
Hadramaut’s military architecture was unique in ancient Arabia, featuring multi-story fortifications that could reach six stories high [42]. These vertical defensive structures, documented at Shabwa and other sites, represented an adaptation to the kingdom’s geographic position and the need to defend valuable frankincense groves with limited manpower [43]. The kingdom’s military strategy emphasized defensive warfare and strategic retreats—when defeated, the government could continue functioning from secondary centers while maintaining control of the economically vital frankincense production areas [44].
The kingdom’s relationships with its neighbors were complex and often shifted based on economic considerations. In the 7th century BCE, Hadramaut allied with Saba under Karib’il Watar, but this relationship quickly soured as both kingdoms competed for control of trade routes [45, 46]. By the 4th century BCE, archaeological evidence indicates Hadramaut and Ma’in were ruled by the same royal family, creating a powerful commercial bloc [47]. The kingdom joined the great anti-Sabaean coalition in the 1st century BCE, demonstrating its continued military relevance [48]. Hadramaut’s final century saw successful expansion, including the annexation of Qataban in the 2nd century CE, before falling to Himyarite conquest around 300 CE [49, 50].
Himyar’s Conquest & Religious Revolution
The Kingdom of Himyar emerged as an independent power in 110 BCE through secession from Qataban, initially controlling only the southwestern highlands around their capital Zafar [51, 52]. What followed was one of the most methodical conquest campaigns in ancient history, as Himyarite rulers spent three centuries systematically absorbing every other South Arabian kingdom [53]. Archaeological evidence from Heidelberg University’s excavations at Zafar reveals a sophisticated urban center with a population of approximately 25,000 in the 4th century CE, supported by five identified royal palaces [54].
Himyar’s military success stemmed from several innovations in Arabian warfare. Unlike their predecessors who relied on temporary coalitions, Himyarite kings created a unified command structure that integrated major Yemeni tribes—including Himyar, Madhhij, Kinda, and Murad—under single leadership [55]. Their military technology, documented through archaeological finds, was comparable to Byzantine equipment, featuring armored horses, round shields, spears, and scale or mail armor [56]. The kingdom also developed naval capabilities that allowed military expeditions along the East African coast [57].
The most revolutionary aspect of Himyarite rule was the state adoption of monotheism, with the ruling class converting to Judaism around 375-400 CE [58, 59]. This religious transformation, evidenced by a sharp break in inscriptional formulas from polytheistic invocations to mentions of “Rahmanan” (the Merciful), served as both a unifying political tool and ultimately the catalyst for the kingdom’s destruction [60]. King Yūsuf Asʾar Yathʾar’s persecution of Christians in Najrān (520/523 CE) prompted Byzantine Emperor Justin I to encourage Aksumite intervention, leading to the Ethiopian invasion that ended Himyarite independence in 525 CE [61, 62, 63].
The Nabataean Kingdom Bridges North & South
Operating from their spectacular capital at Petra, the Nabataean Kingdom (312 BCE-106 CE) controlled the northern segments of the incense trade routes, serving as the crucial link between South Arabian producers and Mediterranean consumers [64, 65, 66]. Unlike the southern kingdoms that fought over production areas, the Nabataeans built their power on controlling distribution networks and maintaining the trade secrets that gave them their commercial advantage [67].
The Nabataeans revolutionized desert warfare through their mastery of water control as a military weapon [68]. Their hidden cistern systems, known only to Nabataean guides, allowed them to operate in terrain where conventional armies would perish from thirst [69]. Archaeological evidence reveals sophisticated hydraulic engineering with ceramic pipeline technology requiring precise gradient calculations of 2-4 degrees [70, 71]. This technical expertise enabled the Nabataeans to deny water to invading armies while maintaining their own forces in seemingly inhospitable regions.
The kingdom’s relationship with the South Arabian states was primarily commercial but had significant political implications [72]. The Nabataeans formed a strategic alliance with Himyar against other South Arabian kingdoms, recognizing that Himyarite control of production areas could complement Nabataean distribution networks [73]. This alliance facilitated Himyarite expansion while ensuring Nabataean commercial interests. The partnership demonstrates how trade relationships could override geographic distance in ancient Arabian geopolitics. The Roman annexation of the Nabataean Kingdom in 106 CE marked the end of independent Arabian control over the northern trade routes [74, 75].
The Transformation Of Arabian Warfare
The military evolution across these six empires reveals a progression from simple territorial conquest to sophisticated combined-arms warfare adapted to Arabian conditions. Early Sabaean campaigns relied on overwhelming force and psychological warfare through systematic destruction [76]. Ma’in pioneered defensive fortification systems while avoiding offensive warfare entirely [77]. Qataban introduced coalition warfare and the innovation of dual kingship for political stability [78]. Hadramaut developed vertical defensive architecture and mastered strategic withdrawal tactics [79].
Each kingdom contributed unique innovations to Arabian military technology. The Sabaeans’ expertise in siege warfare and hydraulic engineering for military purposes set early standards [80]. Minaean fortifications at Baraqish, with their counter-fort reinforcement systems, represented advanced defensive architecture [81, 82]. Qatabanian flash-flood irrigation methods had military applications in defending settlements [83]. Hadramaut’s multi-story fortresses provided vertical defense advantages in desert terrain. Himyarite military organization unified tribal forces under centralized command, while their adoption of Byzantine-style equipment modernized Arabian armies [84]. The Nabataeans’ water denial tactics and desert navigation expertise represented perhaps the most sophisticated adaptation to Arabian geographic conditions [85].
Economic Warfare & Trade Route Conflicts
The competition for control over frankincense and myrrh trade routes drove much of the conflict between these kingdoms [86, 87]. Archaeological evidence reveals a complex network of trade relationships where commercial cooperation could exist alongside political rivalry [88]. The incense route passed successively through Hadramaut, Qataban, Saba, and Ma’in before reaching Nabataean-controlled northern segments, creating multiple friction points where kingdoms could extract taxes or disrupt competitor revenues [89, 90].
Trade route control involved more than simple territorial possession. Kingdoms needed to maintain caravan security, provide water and supplies, negotiate safe passage with nomadic tribes, and protect merchants from rivals [91]. The Minaeans excelled at establishing international trading posts, the Nabataeans at desert route management, and Hadramaut at controlling production sources [92]. Conflicts often arose when kingdoms attempted to bypass intermediaries—Sabaean attacks on Minaean caravans represented attempts to reassert control over trade their rival had diverted [93].
The wealth generated by the incense trade funded monumental architecture, professional armies, and technological innovations across all six kingdoms [94]. Timna’s 65 temples, Petra’s rock-cut facades, Shabwa’s massive fortifications, and Marib’s great dam all testified to the prosperity that trade control could bring [95]. However, this wealth also attracted external interest, from Ptolemaic attempts to establish direct sea routes to Roman military expeditions seeking to capture Arabian riches [96].
The Cycle Of Rise & Fall
The pattern of succession among these empires reveals consistent factors in both rise and decline. Kingdoms typically emerged through a combination of geographic advantages, military innovation, or control of crucial resources [97]. Saba’s early dominance stemmed from military superiority and strategic position [98]. Ma’in rose through commercial innovation [99]. Qataban leveraged coalition politics. Hadramaut’s frankincense monopoly provided lasting power [100]. Himyar’s systematic conquest strategy proved most effective [101]. The Nabataeans dominated through desert expertise [102].
Decline typically resulted from multiple convergent factors rather than single causes. Saba’s fall combined economic disruption from Ptolemaic sea routes with military pressure from coalitions [103]. Ma’in’s commercial focus left it militarily vulnerable [104]. Qataban’s strategic position between expanding powers proved untenable. Even Hadramaut’s frankincense monopoly couldn’t protect against Himyarite military superiority [105]. Himyar fell to external intervention triggered by religious persecution [106]. The Nabataeans succumbed to Roman imperial expansion [107].
The transitions between empires rarely involved complete destruction. Instead, conquering powers typically absorbed administrative systems, trade networks, and cultural practices from their predecessors [108]. Himyar adopted Sabaean language and administrative practices to legitimize their rule [109]. The Nabataeans inherited Minaean trading networks. This continuity helped preserve Arabian commercial and cultural traditions even as political control shifted between different ruling elites [110].
The Legacy Of Arabian Imperial Competition
The complex interactions between these six empires created lasting impacts on Arabian Peninsula development. Their collective control of the incense trade connected Arabia to Mediterranean, African, and Asian markets, establishing commercial patterns that persisted into the Islamic period [111, 112]. The irrigation systems, urban planning techniques, and architectural innovations developed by these kingdoms supported population centers that remain inhabited today [113].
Military innovations pioneered by these empires influenced warfare throughout the region. Coalition warfare, perfected by Qataban’s anti-Sabaean alliance, became a standard feature of Arabian politics [114]. Defensive techniques developed for desert conditions, from Hadramaut’s vertical fortresses to Nabataean water-denial tactics, provided models for subsequent Arabian military architects. The integration of tribal forces under centralized command, achieved by Himyar, presaged similar developments in the early Islamic conquests [115].
The gradual political unification achieved by Himyar, though ending in foreign conquest, demonstrated the possibility of Arabian unity that would inspire future attempts at peninsula-wide control [116]. The religious transformation from polytheism to monotheism initiated by Himyar prepared the ground for Arabia’s eventual emergence as the birthplace of Islam [117]. Even in their conflicts and competition, these ancient empires collectively built the foundations for Arabia’s central role in world history.
Conclusion
The history of ancient Arabia’s six great empires—Saba, Ma’in, Qataban, Hadramaut, Himyar, and the Nabataeans—reveals far more than a simple succession of kingdoms rising and falling in isolation. Instead, their story demonstrates a complex system of interconnected civilizations whose interactions fundamentally shaped the Arabian Peninsula’s development. Through their conflicts over trade routes, innovations in desert warfare, and experiments in political organization, these empires created a legacy that extended far beyond their individual lifespans.
The transformation from Sabaean military hegemony to Himyarite religious unity represents a 1,500-year evolution in Arabian statecraft. Each empire contributed crucial innovations: Saba’s siege warfare and hydraulic engineering, Ma’in’s international commercial networks, Qataban’s coalition diplomacy, Hadramaut’s defensive architecture, Himyar’s tribal unification, and the Nabataeans’ desert survival tactics. These developments were not isolated achievements but emerged through constant interaction, competition, and exchange between neighboring powers.
Perhaps most significantly, the struggles between these empires over the incense trade created the economic and political infrastructure that would support future Arabian civilizations. The trade routes they fought to control, the cities they built to dominate strategic locations, and the diplomatic relationships they forged across the ancient world established Arabia as a crucial link between East and West. When Islam emerged in the 7th century CE, it inherited not a blank desert slate but a peninsula rich with urban centers, trade networks, and political traditions developed over centuries of imperial competition. The ancient empires of Arabia, through their very conflicts and rivalries, had unknowingly prepared the stage for their peninsula’s most influential contribution to world history.
Appendix:
1. Chronology Of Empires Of The Arabian Peninsula
- Sabaean Kingdom (1200-275 CE) – Yemen
- Kingdom of Ma’in (8th-1st century BCE) – Yemen
- Kingdom of Qataban (4th century BCE-200 CE) – Yemen
- Kingdom of Hadramaut (8th century BCE-300 CE) – Yemen
- Kingdom of Himyar (110 BCE-525 CE) – Yemen
- Nabataean Kingdom (312 BCE-106 CE) – Petra/Northern Arabia
2. Sources For References
- Ancient history of Yemen – Wikipedia – https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ancient_history_of_Yemen
- History of Yemen – Wikipedia – https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Yemen
- Kingdom of Hadhramaut – Wikipedia – https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kingdom_of_Hadhramaut
- Pre-Islamic Arabia – Wikipedia – https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pre-Islamic_Arabia
- History of Arabia – Sabaean, Minaean Kingdoms | Britannica – https://www.britannica.com/place/history-of-Arabia-31558/Sabaean-and-Minaean-kingdoms
- Saba and the Sabeans | Middle East And North Africa — Facts and Details – https://africame.factsanddetails.com/article/entry-852.html
- Ancient history of Yemen – Wikipedia – https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ancient_history_of_Yemen
- History of Yemen – Wikipedia – https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Yemen
- Kingdom of Saba – World History Encyclopedia – https://www.worldhistory.org/Kingdom_of_Saba/
- Kingdom of Saba – https://www.worldhistory.org/Kingdom_of_Saba/
- Sheba – Wikipedia – https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sheba
- History of Arabia – Sabaean, Minaean Kingdoms | Britannica – https://www.britannica.com/place/history-of-Arabia-31558/Sabaean-and-Minaean-kingdoms
- Sheba – Wikipedia – https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sabaean_Kingdom
- History of Arabia – Sabaean, Minaean Kingdoms | Britannica – https://www.britannica.com/place/history-of-Arabia-31558/Sabaean-and-Minaean-kingdoms
- Pre-Islamic Arabia – Wikipedia – https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pre-Islamic_Arabia
- Kingdom of Saba – https://www.worldhistory.org/Kingdom_of_Saba/
- Sheba – Wikipedia – https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sheba
- Karib’il Watar – Wikipedia – https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karib’il_Watar
- Saba and the Sabeans | Middle East And North Africa — Facts and Details – https://africame.factsanddetails.com/article/entry-852.html
- Sheba – Wikipedia – https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sabaean_Kingdom
- Pre-Islamic Arabia – Wikipedia – https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pre-Islamic_Arabia
- Pre-Islamic Arabia – Wikipedia – https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pre-Islamic_Arabia
- Karib’il Watar – Wikipedia – https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karib’il_Watar
- Pre-Islamic Arabia – Wikipedia – https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pre-Islamic_Arabia
- History of Arabia – Sabaean, Minaean Kingdoms | Britannica – https://www.britannica.com/place/history-of-Arabia-31558/Sabaean-and-Minaean-kingdoms
- Sabaean | Religion, Alphabet, & Kingdom | Britannica – https://www.britannica.com/topic/Sabaean-people
- History of Arabia – Sabaean, Minaean Kingdoms | Britannica – https://www.britannica.com/place/history-of-Arabia-31558/Sabaean-and-Minaean-kingdoms
- History of Yemen – Wikipedia – https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Yemen
- Ancient South Arabian art – Wikipedia – https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ancient_South_Arabian_art
- Ancient history of Yemen – Wikipedia – https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ancient_history_of_Yemen
- Kingdom of Saba – https://www.worldhistory.org/Kingdom_of_Saba/
- Saba’ | Arabia, Map, & History | Britannica – https://www.britannica.com/place/Saba-ancient-kingdom-Arabia
- Kingdom of Saba – World History Encyclopedia – https://www.worldhistory.org/Kingdom_of_Saba/
- History of Arabia – Sabaean, Minaean Kingdoms | Britannica – https://www.britannica.com/place/history-of-Arabia-31558/Sabaean-and-Minaean-kingdoms
- Southern Arabia – https://nabataea.net/explore/travel_and_trade/southern-arabia/
- Sabaean | Religion, Alphabet, & Kingdom | Britannica – https://www.britannica.com/topic/Sabaean-people
- Kingdom of Saba – https://www.worldhistory.org/Kingdom_of_Saba/
- History of Arabia – Sabaean, Minaean Kingdoms | Britannica – https://www.britannica.com/place/history-of-Arabia-31558/Sabaean-and-Minaean-kingdoms
- Ma’in – Wikipedia – https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minaeans
- History of Arabia – Sabaean, Minaean Kingdoms | Britannica – https://www.britannica.com/place/history-of-Arabia-31558/Sabaean-and-Minaean-kingdoms
- Pre-Islamic Arabia – Wikipedia – https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pre-Islamic_Arabia
- History of Yemen – Wikipedia – https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Yemen
- Southern Arabia – https://nabataea.net/explore/travel_and_trade/southern-arabia/
- Ancient history of Yemen – Wikipedia – https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ancient_history_of_Yemen
- Ma’in – Wikipedia – https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minaeans
- History of Arabia – Sabaean, Minaean Kingdoms | Britannica – https://www.britannica.com/place/history-of-Arabia-31558/Sabaean-and-Minaean-kingdoms
- Pre-Islamic Arabia – Wikipedia – https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pre-Islamic_Arabia
- History of Arabia – Sabaean, Minaean Kingdoms | Britannica – https://www.britannica.com/place/history-of-Arabia-31558/Sabaean-and-Minaean-kingdoms
- Ma’in – Wikipedia – https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minaeans
- History of Arabia – Sabaean, Minaean Kingdoms | Britannica – https://www.britannica.com/place/history-of-Arabia-31558/Sabaean-and-Minaean-kingdoms
- Ma’in – Wikipedia – https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minaeans
- History of Yemen – Wikipedia – https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Yemen
- Ma’in – Wikipedia – https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minaeans
- Minaeans – Wikipedia – https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minaean
- Ma’in – Wikipedia – https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minaeans
- Qataban – Wikipedia – https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qataban
- Pre-Islamic Arabia – Wikipedia – https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pre-Islamic_Arabia
- History of Yemen – Incense Caravan – Travel to Yemen – https://www.incensecaravan.com/history.html
- Pre-Islamic Arabia – Wikipedia – https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pre-Islamic_Arabia
- Ancient history of Yemen – Wikipedia – https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ancient_history_of_Yemen
- History of Arabia – Sabaean, Minaean Kingdoms | Britannica – https://www.britannica.com/place/history-of-Arabia-31558/Sabaean-and-Minaean-kingdoms
- Pre-Islamic Arabia – Wikipedia – https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pre-Islamic_Arabia
- Excavations: Timna – Smithsonian’s National Museum of Asian Art – https://asia-archive.si.edu/exhibition/excavations-timna/
- Qataban – Wikipedia – https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qataban
- History of Arabia – Sabaean, Minaean Kingdoms | Britannica – https://www.britannica.com/place/history-of-Arabia-31558/Sabaean-and-Minaean-kingdoms
- Pre-Islamic Arabia – Wikipedia – https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pre-Islamic_Arabia
- Qataban – Wikipedia – https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qataban
- Qataban – Wikipedia – https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qataban
- Kingdom of Hadhramaut – Wikipedia – https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kingdom_of_Hadhramaut
- Pre-Islamic Arabia – Wikipedia – https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pre-Islamic_Arabia
- Qataban – Wikipedia – https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qataban
- Pre-Islamic Arabia – Wikipedia – https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pre-Islamic_Arabia
- Pre-Islamic Arabia – https://slife.org/pre-islamic-arabia/
- Qataban – Wikipedia – https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qataban
- Pre-Islamic Arabia – Wikipedia – https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pre-Islamic_Arabia
- Qataban – Wikipedia – https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qataban
- Arabs – Wikipedia – https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arabs
- Ancient history of Yemen – Wikipedia – https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ancient_history_of_Yemen
- Himyar – Wikipedia – https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Himyar
- Pre-Islamic Arabia – Wikipedia – https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pre-Islamic_Arabia
- Pre-Islamic Arabia – https://slife.org/pre-islamic-arabia/
- Kingdom of Hadhramaut – Wikipedia – https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kingdom_of_Hadhramaut
- Pre-Islamic Arabia – Wikipedia – https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pre-Islamic_Arabia
- History of Arabia – Sabaean, Minaean Kingdoms | Britannica – https://www.britannica.com/place/history-of-Arabia-31558/Sabaean-and-Minaean-kingdoms
- Pre-Islamic Arabia – https://slife.org/pre-islamic-arabia/
- Ancient history of Yemen – Wikipedia – https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ancient_history_of_Yemen
- Pre-Islamic Arabia – Wikipedia – https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pre-Islamic_Arabia
- History of Arabia – Sabaean, Minaean Kingdoms | Britannica – https://www.britannica.com/place/history-of-Arabia-31558/Sabaean-and-Minaean-kingdoms
- Kingdom of Hadhramaut – Wikipedia – https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kingdom_of_Hadhramaut
- Ancient history of Yemen – Wikipedia – https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ancient_history_of_Yemen
- Pre-Islamic Arabia – Wikipedia – https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pre-Islamic_Arabia
- Kingdom of Saba – https://www.worldhistory.org/Kingdom_of_Saba/
- History of Yemen – Incense Caravan – Travel to Yemen – https://www.incensecaravan.com/history.html
- Hadhramaut – Wikipedia – https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hadhramaut
- History of Arabia – Sabaean, Minaean Kingdoms | Britannica – https://www.britannica.com/place/history-of-Arabia-31558/Sabaean-and-Minaean-kingdoms
- Ancient history of Yemen – Wikipedia – https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ancient_history_of_Yemen
- History of Yemen – Incense Caravan – Travel to Yemen – https://www.incensecaravan.com/history.html
- Hadhramaut – Wikipedia – https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hadhramaut
- Pre-Islamic Arabia – Wikipedia – https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pre-Islamic_Arabia
- Kingdom of Hadhramaut – Wikipedia – https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kingdom_of_Hadhramaut
- Ancient history of Yemen – Wikipedia – https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ancient_history_of_Yemen
- Pre-Islamic Arabia – Wikipedia – https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pre-Islamic_Arabia
- Himyarite Kingdom – Google Books – https://books.google.com/books/about/Himyarite_Kingdom.html?id=nX_aQgAACAAJ
- Kingdom of Saba – World History Encyclopedia – https://www.worldhistory.org/Kingdom_of_Saba/
- Kingdom of Saba – https://www.worldhistory.org/Kingdom_of_Saba/
- History of Yemen – Incense Caravan – Travel to Yemen – https://www.incensecaravan.com/history.html
- Hadhramaut – Wikipedia – https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hadhramaut
- Pre-Islamic Arabia – https://slife.org/pre-islamic-arabia/
- Pre-Islamic Arabia – Wikipedia – https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pre-Islamic_Arabia
- Himyar – Wikipedia – https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Himyar
- Pre-Islamic Arabia – Wikipedia – https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pre-Islamic_Arabia
- Himyarite Kingdom – Google Books – https://books.google.com/books/about/Himyarite_Kingdom.html?id=nX_aQgAACAAJ
- Saba and Himyar – Alsadiqin Institute – http://www.alsadiqin.org/en/index.php/Saba_and_Himyar
- Pre-Islamic Arabia – https://slife.org/pre-islamic-arabia/
- Himyar | Kingdom, Religion, & Language | Britannica – https://www.britannica.com/topic/Himyar
- Himyar – Wikipedia – https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Himyar
- History of Arabia – Himyarites, Sabaeans, Bedouins | Britannica – https://www.britannica.com/place/history-of-Arabia-31558/Himyarites