The evolution of humanoid robot control systems represents one of the most significant technological advances in robotics over the past several decades. From the early mechanical servants described in ancient texts to today’s sophisticated machines capable of learning and adapting to their environments, the journey of robot control has been marked by continuous innovation and breakthrough discoveries.
This article explores the progression of control methodologies in humanoid robotics, tracing the path from traditional approaches like the Zero Moment Point (ZMP) to cutting-edge machine learning techniques that are reshaping the field.
Traditional Control Methods: The Foundation
Traditional humanoid robot control has relied on two foundational approaches: Zero Moment Point (ZMP) control and dynamic model-based control. ZMP methodology, pioneered by robots like Honda’s ASIMO (2000) and the HRP series, maintains balance by ensuring the robot’s center of pressure stays within its support area, enabling stable walking at speeds up to 1.4 km/h on flat surfaces. Dynamic model-based control, exemplified by Waseda University’s WABIAN-2 (2005) and Beijing Institute of Technology’s BHR-5 (2012), uses mathematical models to calculate forces and torques needed for movement, achieving human-like walking patterns with systems featuring 30-41 degrees of freedom.
While these methods have been instrumental in achieving bipedal locomotion and work well for predetermined movements on level terrain, both approaches struggle with unexpected disturbances, uneven surfaces, and sudden environmental changes, highlighting their limitations in real-world applications.
Zero Moment Point (ZMP) Control
The Zero Moment Point (ZMP) methodology has served as the cornerstone of humanoid robot control since its inception. This approach focuses on maintaining dynamic balance by ensuring that the point where the total moment of inertial and gravitational forces equals zero remains within the robot’s support polygon. The ZMP-based method excels in generating stable gait patterns and has been fundamental in achieving bipedal locomotion.
Honda’s ASIMO robot, introduced in 2000, represents one of the most successful implementations of ZMP-based control. ASIMO2000 was the first globally influential humanoid robot, capable of anticipating future movements and proactively adjusting its center of gravity. This innovation allowed for seamless walking during turns. The robot could walk at speeds up to 1.4 km/h and demonstrated remarkable stability on flat surfaces.
Similarly, the HRP series developed by Japan’s National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST) extensively utilized ZMP control. The HRP-2, introduced in 2004, stood 1.54 meters tall and weighed 58 kg, demonstrating stable bipedal walking through sophisticated ZMP calculations. These robots validated the effectiveness of ZMP for predetermined movements, though they struggled with unexpected disturbances or uneven terrain.
Dynamic Model-Based Control
Complementing ZMP methods, dynamic model-based control approaches offer excellent stability with lower computational complexity. These methods employ mathematical models of the robot’s dynamics to predict and control movement. By modeling the robot as a system of interconnected rigid bodies, engineers can calculate the forces and torques required for desired motions.
The WABIAN-2 robot from Waseda University, developed in 2005, exemplified dynamic model-based control. With 41 degrees of freedom and weighing 64.5 kg, WABIAN-2 achieved human-like walking patterns by modeling the dynamics of each joint and link. The robot could maintain balance while performing complex movements, though primarily on level surfaces.
Beijing Institute of Technology’s BHR series also implemented dynamic model-based approaches. The BHR-5, developed in 2012, featured 30 degrees of freedom and demonstrated stable walking on unknown terrain through real-time dynamic calculations. However, like other implementations of this method, it faced challenges when confronted with highly irregular surfaces or sudden environmental changes.
The Rise Of Optimization-Based Control
The evolution of optimization-based control has revolutionized humanoid robotics, with Model Predictive Control (MPC) and trajectory optimization emerging as game-changing technologies that enable robots to perform increasingly complex and dynamic movements. MPC transforms robot control into a real-time optimization problem, allowing robots like Boston Dynamics’ Atlas to execute remarkable feats such as backflips and parkour by continuously calculating optimal action sequences while predicting future states. This approach has been further enhanced through trajectory optimization techniques that find optimal movement paths while respecting physical constraints—as demonstrated by KAIST’s DRC-HUBO robot, which won the DARPA Robotics Challenge by dynamically switching between bipedal and wheeled locomotion, and the Italian Institute of Technology’s WALK-MAN robot, which coordinates all 33 joints simultaneously for complex manipulation tasks.
Together, these optimization-based methods have enabled humanoid robots to navigate challenging environments, maintain balance during multi-contact movements, and achieve unprecedented levels of agility and versatility in real-world applications.
Model Predictive Control (MPC)
Model Predictive Control represents a significant advancement in humanoid robot control, enabling robots to make real-time decisions based on predictions of future states. MPC formulates control as an optimization problem, continuously solving for the best sequence of actions over a finite time horizon.
Boston Dynamics’ Atlas robot extensively employs MPC for its remarkable dynamic capabilities. The robot uses optimization-based locomotion planning that allows it to navigate conveyor belts, avoid obstacles, and maintain balance even in challenging scenarios. Atlas can perform complex maneuvers including backflips and parkour-style movements through continuous optimization of its trajectory over multiple time steps.
Recent research has shown MPC being used for centroidal trajectory generation and stabilization based on preview control for humanoid multi-contact motion. This approach has enabled robots to plan and execute movements involving multiple contact points with the environment, significantly expanding their operational capabilities.
Trajectory Optimization
Trajectory optimization techniques focus on finding the optimal path for robot movement while considering various constraints such as joint limits, collision avoidance, and energy efficiency.
The DRC-HUBO robot developed by KAIST employed trajectory optimization to win the DARPA Robotics Challenge. The robot could dynamically switch between bipedal and wheeled locomotion modes, optimizing its trajectory based on the terrain and task requirements. With 33 degrees of freedom and weighing 80 kg, DRC-HUBO demonstrated how trajectory optimization could enable versatile locomotion strategies.
The Italian Institute of Technology’s WALK-MAN robot, developed in 2013, utilized trajectory optimization for whole-body control. Standing 1.85 meters tall and weighing 120 kg, WALK-MAN could perform complex manipulation tasks while maintaining balance through optimized motion planning that considered all 33 joints simultaneously.
Bionic & Model-Based Innovations
Recent advances in humanoid robot locomotion leverage biologically-inspired control systems to achieve more natural and adaptive movement. Central Pattern Generators (CPGs), neural circuits that mimic how biological organisms produce rhythmic movements like walking, have revolutionized robot control by enabling smooth transitions between different gaits and terrains without explicit programming for each pattern—as demonstrated in research with the NAO robot’s ability to walk on various surfaces and recover from disturbances. Complementing this approach, Virtual Gravity Compensation (VGC) methods enhance stability by virtually adjusting gravitational forces acting on the robot, allowing for dynamic movements even on uneven terrain; the iCub robot exemplifies this technology’s effectiveness, maintaining balance while performing complex manipulation tasks despite significant shifts in its center of mass.
Together, these bionic and model-based innovations represent a paradigm shift from traditional control methods, bringing humanoid robots closer to the fluid, adaptive locomotion seen in nature.
Central Pattern Generators (CPG)
Inspired by biological systems, Central Pattern Generators represent a paradigm shift in robot control. CPGs are neural circuits that produce rhythmic patterns without requiring continuous sensory feedback, mimicking the way biological organisms generate repetitive movements like walking or swimming.
Research teams have successfully implemented CPG-based control in various humanoid robots. The bionic methods utilize biological properties and can be planned from human control principles, enabling robots to generate natural walking patterns that adapt to different speeds and terrains. For instance, robots using CPG control have demonstrated the ability to transition smoothly between walking speeds without explicit programming for each gait pattern.
The NAO robot from Aldebaran Robotics, standing 57 cm tall with 25 degrees of freedom, has been used extensively in research implementing CPG-based locomotion. Researchers have demonstrated that CPG controllers can enable NAO to walk on various surfaces and recover from perturbations more naturally than traditional methods.
Virtual Gravity Compensation (VGC)
Virtual Gravity Compensation methods have emerged as powerful tools for enabling stable walking on uneven terrain and in the presence of disturbances.
The VGC method has been specifically developed to facilitate stable walking on uneven terrain and in the presence of disturbances. By virtually adjusting the gravitational forces acting on the robot, this approach allows for more dynamic movements while maintaining stability.
Implementations on robots like the iCub, developed by the Italian Institute of Technology, have shown the effectiveness of VGC. The iCub, with its 53 degrees of freedom and sophisticated sensor suite including cameras, IMU, and force/torque sensors, uses VGC to maintain balance while performing manipulation tasks that shift its center of mass significantly.
The Machine Learning Revolution
The machine learning revolution has fundamentally transformed humanoid robot control through three key approaches: reinforcement learning (RL), deep reinforcement learning (DRL), and demonstration learning. RL enables robots to master complex motor skills through trial and error, with both model-free and model-based approaches showing success in tasks like push recovery, where robots learn to recover from disturbances through thousands of simulated trials. The integration of deep learning with RL has yielded breakthrough results, exemplified by Tesla’s Optimus robot which uses advanced neural networks to achieve human-like dexterity and adapt its movements through experience, while research has shown DRL enabling visual navigation in bipedal robots using only camera input.
Complementing these approaches, demonstration learning allows robots to acquire skills by observing human movements, as seen in systems like Rethink Robotics’ Baxter which revolutionized industrial robotics by allowing workers to teach tasks through direct manipulation, and the ADHERENT system which uses behavior cloning to help humanoid robots learn complex coordinated movements from human demonstrations—collectively representing a paradigm shift from rigid pre-programming to adaptive, learning-based control systems.
Reinforcement Learning Approaches
The advent of machine learning, particularly reinforcement learning (RL), has fundamentally transformed humanoid robot control. RL enables robots to learn complex motor skills through trial and error, gradually improving their performance based on reward feedback from the environment.
Model-free RL methods have been successfully applied to humanoid robots for learning push recovery behaviors. Research has shown robots learning to recover from disturbances through thousands of simulated trials, developing strategies that were not explicitly programmed. These methods optimize policies through iterative interactions with the environment, learning through trial and error.
Model-based RL approaches have been demonstrated on platforms like the humanoid robot learning push recovery with dynamical movement primitives. By learning to simulate the environment and using this model for planning, robots have achieved more sample-efficient learning compared to model-free approaches.
Deep Reinforcement Learning
The integration of deep learning with reinforcement learning has created Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL), which has achieved unprecedented results in humanoid robot control.
Tesla’s Optimus robot, unveiled in 2022, exemplifies the application of deep reinforcement learning in humanoid robotics. The robot demonstrates human-like dexterity and can perform tasks like bending over, waving to audiences, and executing simple dance moves. With 40 degrees of freedom and weighing 56 kg, Optimus uses advanced neural networks to learn from experience and adapt its movements.
Research has shown DRL being used for visual navigation in bipedal humanoid robots, where robots learn to navigate using only camera input. The combination of convolutional neural networks for visual processing and reinforcement learning for decision-making has enabled robots to navigate complex environments without pre-programmed maps.
Demonstration Learning
Demonstration learning, also known as imitation learning, offers a complementary approach to reinforcement learning by enabling robots to acquire skills through observing human demonstrations.
The WALK-MAN robot has been used in demonstration learning research where it learned manipulation tasks by observing human movements. Using inverse reinforcement learning, the robot could infer the underlying objectives of demonstrated tasks and generalize to new situations.
Rethink Robotics’ Baxter robot revolutionized demonstration learning in industrial settings. Workers could teach Baxter new tasks simply by moving its arms in the desired motion and having the robot memorize them. This approach eliminated the need for programming expertise, making robot training accessible to regular workers.
Recent advances include the ADHERENT system, which uses behavior cloning for learning human-like trajectory generators for whole-body control of humanoid robots. This approach has enabled robots to learn complex coordinated movements involving multiple limbs from human demonstrations.
Integration & Future Directions
The future of humanoid robot control lies in hybrid approaches that seamlessly integrate traditional stability methods with advanced learning techniques, exemplified by robots like AIST’s HRP-5P, which combines ZMP-based stability control with learned perception for construction tasks, and research showing that robots can learn basic skills from demonstrations before refining them through reinforcement learning. Real-time adaptation has become equally crucial, with modern control systems processing sensor data at over 1000 Hz to make millisecond adjustments—as demonstrated by Boston Dynamics’ Atlas maintaining balance on uneven surfaces and recovering from disturbances, and KAIST’s DRC-HUBO dynamically switching between walking and rolling modes based on terrain assessment during the DARPA Robotics Challenge, showcasing how these integrated systems create more robust, adaptable robots capable of handling complex real-world environments.
Hybrid Approaches
The future of humanoid robot control lies in the integration of multiple approaches. Modern robots increasingly combine traditional stability methods with advanced learning techniques.
The HRP-5P robot from AIST represents this hybrid approach. Standing 1.82 meters tall with high-power joints, HRP-5P combines traditional ZMP-based stability control with learning-based perception and planning. The robot can perform construction tasks like installing drywall sheets, using ZMP for basic stability while employing learned skills for tool manipulation and environmental interaction.
Research on combining demonstration learning with reinforcement learning has shown that robots can first learn basic skills from human demonstrations, then refine and adapt these skills through reinforcement learning. This combination addresses the limitations of each individual approach, resulting in more robust and adaptable control systems.
Real-Time Adaptation
Modern control systems increasingly focus on real-time adaptation capabilities, with robots now able to adjust their strategies within milliseconds.
Boston Dynamics’ Atlas demonstrates exceptional real-time adaptation, maintaining balance when pushed, walking on uneven surfaces, and recovering from slips. The robot‘s control system processes sensor data at over 1000 Hz, making continuous adjustments to maintain stability and achieve desired movements.
Similarly, KAIST’s DRC-HUBO showed real-time adaptation during the DARPA Robotics Challenge, switching between walking and rolling modes based on terrain assessment. The robot could evaluate surface conditions and choose the most efficient locomotion method in real-time, demonstrating the practical benefits of adaptive control systems.
Final Thoughts
The evolution from Zero Moment Point control to sophisticated machine learning approaches represents a fundamental transformation in humanoid robotics. While traditional methods like those used in ASIMO and HRP robots provided the foundation for stable bipedal locomotion, the integration of optimization techniques in robots like Atlas and machine learning in platforms like Optimus has enabled robots to achieve human-like adaptability and performance.
As we look to the future, the continued convergence of these approaches promises even more capable and versatile humanoid robots. The combination of theoretical advances, computational improvements, and innovative control strategies will drive the next generation of robots capable of seamlessly integrating into human environments and performing increasingly complex tasks.
The journey from simple mechanical calculations to intelligent, adaptive control systems reflects not just technological progress, but a deeper understanding of movement, balance, and the principles that govern both biological and artificial locomotion. As control systems continue to evolve, humanoid robots will become increasingly capable partners in human endeavors, limited only by our imagination and ingenuity in developing new control paradigms.
Thanks for reading!